Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 841 - 860
of 9,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm
According to ACI, this is an "advanced forum for brand name and generic counsel on the intricacies of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:15 am
Kraft Food Group Brands. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:07 am
This recall involves Ryobi brand, Lithium 18 V 4Ah battery packs, with model P108 and part number 130429028. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
In Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:04 am
We all knew American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:28 pm
In Gaeta v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:17 am
In Sears Brands, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:50 pm
The decision is reminiscent of Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:50 pm
The decision is reminiscent of Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm
Supp. 3d 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2020).; and the District Court for the Western District of Texas refused to grant a “Brizzy” hard seltzer brand a preliminary injunction against Molson Coors over a competing “Vizzy” product because both names were based on the common descriptive term fizzy in Future Proof Brands, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:10 pm
” Excerpts of the Case: Fruit Creations, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:29 pm
They are important in protecting a brand’s identity and ensuring consumers recognize brands in the marketplace. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
B&B v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:13 am
And that’s what brings this within the ambit of PLIVA v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:51 am
(Jacobsen v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Rubenstein v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:38 am
One of the primary cases in advertiser-on-advertiser (competitor v. competitor) trademark infringement suits is Storus Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
. are safer taking brand-name drugs. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
” (Hermès Int’l v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:08 am
Marty’s view Now, this case is not being brought in Australia but, if it were, one would wonder about the trade dress prospects given the clear Samsung branding in light of Parkdale v Puxu and its progeny such as Playcorp v Bodum. [read post]
