Search for: "Butler v State" Results 841 - 860 of 1,010
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 8:38 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
(in favor of consolidation) and the decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Baptiste v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:22 pm
A prior post, HERE, and stated as follows: On remand from the Florida Supreme Court (Butler v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:46 pm by MacIsaac
In Arnold, Butler J. cited Bailey when he stated at para. 22 that "[a] reasonable period of time to consider an offer to settle is seven days". [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:05 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., 2009 WL 3793590, A.D. 09-11444 (Butler Co. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:02 pm by Simon Gibbs
The decision in Thomas v Butler and Other T/A Worthingtons Solicitors [2009] EWHC 90153 (Costs) concerned a solicitor/own client assessment but there is no reason to suppose the decision would have been any different if this had been an inter partes assessment. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am by Daniel E. Cummins
TRIAL COURT DECISIONS IN FAVOR OF SEVERANCE (3 cases) Butler County Weichey v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  His books include The Sarbanes-Oxley Debacle and The Constitution and the Corporation (both with Henry Butler), The Law Market (with Erin O'Hara) and The Economics of Federalism (with Kobayashi). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., 2009 WL 3793590, A.D. 09-11444 (Butler Co. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., 2009 WL 3793590, A.D. 09-11444 (Butler Co. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:13 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Strobel and State Farm in favor of severing UIM claims from third party claims in post-Koken cases, her counterpart on the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Judge S. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:52 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Strobel and State Farm, 2009 WL 3793590 (Butler Co., Nov. 5, 2009) Grove v. [read post]