Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 841 - 860 of 1,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:48 am
Much of this case was about whether the court of appeal could go against an earlier judgment of theirs (BMS v Baker Norton, to be exact), and in the end it decided it could, partly because the EPO case law in the area was 'settled' and happened to arrive at the opposite answer to what appeared to be the case in the UK. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Zosha Millman
Baker Hostetler’s Judy Selby writing from New York on the firm’s Copyright, Content, and Platforms Federal Regulatory Involvement in Marijuana – Seattle lawyer Robert McVay of Harris Moure writing on their Canna Law Blog The Apple Fight: Before Arguing About Privacy, Define Privacy – Charles Griffin Intelligence’s Philip Segal writing on their The Ethical Investigator 50 Years: Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:26 pm
The seminal cases were Harper v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
It's a blow for Libby's two talented defense lawyers: Theodore V. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:32 am by Guest Author
Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History 161 (5th ed. 2019). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Eichengrun retained defendants Young Sommer Ward Ritzenberg Baker & Moore LLC (hereinafter Young/Sommer) and Robert Panasci (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) to represent Green Oak and Sterling in that foreclosure action. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
Adler defends the law professors’ amicus brief that he signed, which challenges DOMA on federalism grounds; Ernie Young (in a post by Randy Barnett) does the same at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Allie Gottlieb
Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
Indeed, the parties and the trial court all agree that the excess provision set forth in the first paragraph of Standard Mutual's "other insurance" clause does not apply, but Citizen Insurance's does. [read post]