Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 841 - 860
of 43,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
" Although A 104(1) EPC does not refer to the boards of appeal any more (in contrast to A 104(1) EPC 1973), the boards of appeal still have the power to apportion costs according to A 104(1) EPC. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:43 am
Published: 10/7/2013 11:41 AM [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:43 am
Published: 10/7/2013 11:41 AM [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
State, 2006 OK CR 10, 132 P.3d 1, 2006 Okla. [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:59 am
How Does the FDA Choose Which Drugs to Approve? [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
While Group 1 does not receive any ESG information and thus serves as the control group, the remaining eight groups are given ESG information. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:38 pm
No, it does not look worse. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
The Kentucky Supreme Court's opinion is here, from January 10. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
Blunt instruments like the 1-in-10-out rule, however, impose rigid constraints that ignore regulatory quality. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
Does Georgia Law Require the Tractor to Have Liability Insurance? [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:46 am
It seems to pay back 1%, 2%, and 5% in various categories and then they throw in some type of “$10 reward certificate” for every $10 in regular rewards that you earn. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
October 30, 2018 - 1 PM: Topiclear, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:29 am
What is Wi-Fi Calling and How Does it Work? [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The application was refused because claim 1 did not fulfil the requirements of A 84 and A 123(2) EPC. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:14 pm
1. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:02 am
Without further ado, we give you our verdict on Hollywood’s best pictures about lawyers. 10. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Here is the latest decision by the Enlarged Board, on corrections under R 140.The underlying case was as follows:The opposition (filed on September 10, 2004) had been based on the sole ground of added subject-matter (A 100(c)), the only argument being that in claim 1 of the patent the feature “means for initiating (56) a command related to a position of the device data” was not disclosed in the application as filed. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:08 am
Significantly, if a private inspector finds code violations, the ordinance does not require the inspector to turn his or her findings over to the city. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:12 pm
John Does 1-10, No. 12-cv-3623, 2012 WL 5382304, at *3 (C.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:38 am
USCIS has issued new policy guidance on L-1 intracompany transfer petitions addressing sole proprietorships and Blanket L petitions. [read post]
