Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 841 - 860
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 11:10 am
Corrigendum: As pointed out by Jon Baines on the Twitter: @bainesy1969: Hugh Tomlinson, Q.C. over at Inforrm’s Blog adds: In the circumstances, a reader who knew the background – the “Newsnight” broadcast, the media reports and Lord McAlpine’s status as a “Conservative politician from the Thatcher years” – might well have inferred that the Tweet meant: “Lord McAlpine is trending on Twitter because he is the child abuser is the… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
Regular readers of the Inforrm Blog will be well aware of the continuing debate about the circumstances in which a court should supplement an injunction preventing publication of private information with an order anonymising the names of the litigants as well. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
There was an INFORRM post on the case. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Inforrm, the Guardian cover the judgment and Seymour’s response to the ruling can be read here. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 5:30 pm
I had reported on INFORRM about how the ASA is losing patience with influencer marketing and recently published an article in the Communications Law journal on advertising regulation and transparency in influencers’ endorsements on social media. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
The highest profile media law case of the week was the strike out application in the case of Markle v Associated Newspapers heard remotely on Friday 24 April 2020 by Warby J. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
We had daily reports on Inforrm of the opening submissions (see our reports for Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Inforrm has a summary of the new legal framework here. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
As first discussed on Inforrm, libel cases have increased by 60 per cent since the new Defamation Act was introduced on 1 January 2014, despite predictions that it would lead to a drop in the number of cases. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Inforrm posted commentary on the story here and here. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
I wrote about this in more detail on Inforrm on Friday. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Inforrm had an article explaining the decision, available here. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Inforrm had an article here. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
Accordingly, in respect of cases that concerned a single thread on a Facebook page that contained multiple allegedly defamatory third-party postings, her Honour adopted the reasoning of HHJ Moloney QC – sitting as a High Court Judge – in McGrath v Dawkins [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) (see Inforrm article on that case here), where his Honour stated, in a case that concerned comments posted under Amazon reviews: [53] A special feature of chatroom or forum publications is the way in which… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
There was a discussion of the detail of the proposals on Inforrm. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
We had an Inforrm post about the Court of Cassation’s decision in 2016. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm
(The accuracy of the published statistics collected under CPR PD 40F is regularly questioned by Inforrm’s Blog, but they only relate to INDOs, not privacy or anonymity orders under CPR r 39.) [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Inforrm had a pieces responding to Haugen’s revelations here and here. [read post]
