Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 11,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Every few years, someone sues the State of New York over the bridge and highway tolls, which sometimes charge motorists different amounts of money depending on where you live. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:04 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied defendants’ motion (Pirani v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:01 am
United States, in which taxpayers challenged the constitutionality of the transition tax in the 2017 tax act regarding undistributed earnings from controlled foreign corporations (which were taxed at a low rate in combination with the repeal of deferral, under which they would have been taxable upon repatriation)The taxpayers' challenge is based on the view that Eisner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Be In v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm
My experience is that at least 9 out of 10 contracts contain explicit choice-of-law clauses, which describe in the contract which state's law will govern enforcement.A few years ago, I represented the prevailing defendants in Tradesman Int'l v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
His friendships and emotional state were negatively impacted. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
–MacRae v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
Bollinger entirely, and conclude that “diversity” is not a “compelling state interest” that can potentially justify the use of racial classifications. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:10 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
State of Maryland). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
In Belaire-West Landscaping, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:34 pm
” While this holding rightfully applies to the States who had sought to vindicate the audience interests of their entire populaces, it is more problematic when applied to individual plaintiffs. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:01 am
El Camino Res., LTD. v. [read post]
