Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 841 - 860
of 13,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
Such state rules might face enforcement issues, i.e., from the state attorney generals; and will in most of the cases become obsolete. [read post]
Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Dispute over Employment Agreement to Waive Jury Trial of Disputes
1 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
The Supreme Court of Texas has agreed to hear the case of In re Frank Kent Motor Co. d/b/a Frank Kent Cadillac, No. 10-0687. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
You've generally got to be admitted to the Bar, and the Bar to which you're admitted generally needs to be the one in which you're practicing. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
Lawyer/consultant Jay Fleischman in his article, “LexisNexis And Westlaw Re-Launch – Too Little, Too Late? [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:10 am
During the reexamination, previously re-issued claim 23 was amended and claim 35 was newly added. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:28 am
Don't hold your breath, but the one prayer for stopping enhancement legislation from passing will be if the LBB tells the truth about the bills' cost instead of claiming they're "insignificant. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Large game companies (i.e. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm
EPA's scientific finding on greenhouse gases (i.e. the endangerment finding). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
See In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 899 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:23 pm
Jealous/envious/zealous – These words seem interchangeable, but they’re not. [read post]
18 May 2014, 1:07 pm
“.buzz”, “.webcam” – If you’re a broadcast station and you want to establish (or reinforce) the fact that you’re on top of what’s happening, how about “.buzz” – as in “TheCommLawBlog.buzz”? [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:24 pm
February 29, 2008RE: The Needed Mental Attributes Of A President; The Presidential Campaign And Forthcoming Appointments To The Supreme Court; A Bail Out For Homeowners; And Bloomberg's Game. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 4:12 pm
Is the deal fair, or merely feasible, i.e., the best the DGA thought it could get? [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:49 am
Mom apparently remembered things differently after the trial, in which the jury awarded her $1,000,000 and only $100,000 to Dad (i.e., a 91/9 split). [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 11:16 am
In In re Translogic Technology, Inc. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:37 pm
According to today's 4-3 opinion by the Cal Supremes ( In Re Tobacco II Cases (May 17, 2009) ___Cal.4th___ (S147345)), only the class representative has to have standing. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Thus the decision is based on a situation “where the appeal has already been filed, i.e. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
But seriously, we're sure a good time was had by all. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:01 am
If those two words don’t take you back to first-year contracts, we’re not sure what will. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:37 pm
In re Barrett, Nos. 07-14796, 07-14797 (11th Cir. [read post]
