Search for: "Miller v. State of New York"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Miller, Carol Rittner, John K. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
In New York Cent. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(j) United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Generally, a party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must show: (1) complete domination and control of the subsidiary by the parent with respect to the transaction at issue; and (2) that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff that resulted in the plaintiff's injury (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. , 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Do Gooder Prods., Inc. v American Jewish Theatre, Inc.,… [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court W D New York: Patent requiring ‘trial and error’ and ‘working backwards’ to calculate the value of a claimed variable was invalid for lack of enablement: Tailored Lighting, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:58 pm
A leading relevant case, Gerber v Keyes, was decided by a Florida appellate court and New York State ruled in a similar fashion in Wegman v Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:41 pm
Miller, No 507725 (Mar. 24, 2010), the New York Appellate Division (Third Department) held that when the county legislature authorized the condemnation of property for a road culvert pursuant to New York's Eminent Domain Procedure Law, the county highway department must condemn the property pursuant to the EDPL, and not the Highway Law. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
” Summary Biography [by Tom Goldstein] Elena Kagan was born on April 28, 1960 in New York. [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:31 pm
In H.M. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
This was the significant issue in Leon St.Clair Nation v City of New York.St. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Though she worked about 10 hours a week, Nabors submitted claims to the Unemployment Insurance Division of the New York State Department of Labor (UID) stating that she was not working at all. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:22 am
Although she worked about 10 hours per week she submitted claims to the Unemployment Insurance Division of the New York State Department of Labor [UID] in which she stated that she had not worked any days during her part-time employment.Subsequently Nabors became a full time employee. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Eg Judith Miller of the New York Times. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
The plaintiff in the case sought recovery of costs incurred under a 1998 consent order which required him to reimburse the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) for its costs of cleaning up tetrachloroethene (“PCE”) which had been discovered at 100 Oser Avenue site in Hauppauge, NY (the “Site”). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
Miller, Patriarchy: The Political Theory of Family Authority in the Book of Genesis, (New York University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-23, April 2, 2010).Adham A. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
District Court, District or Connecticut; New York and Connecticut state courts.EducationLaw: Vanderbilt University, J.D. (1998)Undergraduate: State University of New York, B.S., summa cum/aude (1991)Bar Admission(s)New York; Connecticut, U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:41 am
Partnership v Trotta (23 AD3d 389, 389-390) reiterated the criteria for obtaining a use variance in New York stating: "there must be a showing that (1) the property cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for permitted purposes as currently zoned, (2) the hardship resulted from unique characteristics of the property, (3) the proposed use would not alter the character of the neighborhood, and (4) the alleged hardship was not self-created." [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:41 am
Partnership v Trotta (23 AD3d 389, 389-390) reiterated the criteria for obtaining a use variance in New York stating: "there must be a showing that (1) the property cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for permitted purposes as currently zoned, (2) the hardship resulted from unique characteristics of the property, (3) the proposed use would not alter the character of the neighborhood, and (4) the alleged hardship was not self-created. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
The style of the case is, New York Life Insurance Company; New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation and Michael Coffey v. [read post]
