Search for: "People v High" Results 841 - 860 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 10:30 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
The Supreme Court also has weakened the ability of people to band together to challenge malfeasance of large corporations, see Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
Folkerte testified that his tone was `[p]rofessional,’ that there was `nothing exceptional about’ the `dialogue’ that ensued, and that there were `no raised voices’ or `unnecessary high emotions. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:43 pm
Mktg., L.L.C., 61 Cal. 4th 988 (2015); In re Estate of Duke, 61 Cal. 4th 871 (2015); In re Marriage of Davis, 61 Cal. 4th 846 (2015); People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism  v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under SORA, sex offenders are classified into three risk levels: Level 1 (low risk), Level 2 (moderate risk), and Level 3 (high risk). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by William Melater
Turns out, however, that a lot of people not only eat Tagalongs, but people speak Tagalog in the Philippines. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
It's symbolic, and at some high level, maybe there's a role for that. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:14 am by Karen Ainslie
” The Labour Appeal Court then went on to cite the Edcon v Pillemer judgment stating that: “It is however always better if such evidence is led by people who are in a position to testify to such breakdown. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
This case drew a lot of attention from people who care about U.S. foreign relations law because Bond’s second argument asked the Court to overrule Missouri v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am by Deborah Hammonds
Citing the seminal case of Griggs v Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), Kuczynski advised that the courts and the EEOC have applied Griggs consistently, and Congress confirmed it when it amended Title VII in the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [read post]