Search for: "People v. Childs" Results 841 - 860 of 6,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Bajwa & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1093 (06 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2011] EWCA Civ 526 (06 May 2011) C (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 521 (06 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) (06 May 2011) Bacon v Automattic Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) (06 May 2011)High Court (Chancery… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
La. 1986) (no privacy expectation for conversation "broadcast by radio in all directions to be overheard by countless people"); State v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:09 am by Native American Rights Fund
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Juvenile Dependency Appeals)People in Interest of A.B. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:34 pm
" Hence you're not eligible for asylum even if the applicant can demonstrate that that'll happen to her (or her child) if she's deported.Needless to say, that ain't how Judge McKeown views it. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Department of Child Safety, T.C., J.C., Navajo Nation (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:16 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once the court approves the settlement there will be an 89-day deadline by which people with unaccompanied child (UC) determinations who no longer meet the UC definition must file asylum applications with USCIS in order to become class members and lock in the benefits of the settlement agreement . [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
Regarding allegations of scienter, the court cites the following: Plaintiffs allege the following facts that make it plausible that Defendants should have known that the videos of Plaintiffs on Pornhub constituted child pornography. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
"Whether those people, on both sides, agree with what the Supreme Court was going to do or not, didn't mean they didn't see it coming. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:30 am by Jessica Smith
He knows that DSS previously investigated similar allegations made by the child against other people and heard that DSS found those charges to be unfounded. [read post]