Search for: "State v. Barry" Results 841 - 860 of 1,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Download.aspx (delaware.gov) Claim limitation that patent applicant added to avoid examiner’s rejection made a “material” change, barring use of earlier application to set patent’s priority date. 23-1147.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322401.pdf (uscourts.gov) Part owner of trademark owner lacked right to sue to cancel similar trademarks. 23-1383.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322382.pdf (uscourts.gov) Federal Trade Commission sues Live Nation for monopolization and unlawful exclusive… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
  The State Bar of Texas is already looking into the mattter. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
    Middle District of Tennessee 08a0244n.06 Barry v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:12 pm by Christopher Schmidt
”  State enforced segregation was wrong, but so was state enforced integration in certain spheres of private relations. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
 Besides the example of the US (where personality rights are a matter of state law, rather than federal law) in the UK, for instance, there is no such thing as image rights. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Charlton conciselytold the committee that in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:35 am by South Florida Lawyers
  What he did evaluate is whether there are any tangible benefits to the State recognizing only heterosexual marriage, and found -- based on credible social science testimony -- that none exists. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm by Robert L Abell
This creates a tension and sometimes "the state applies its rules in a way that impinges upon the free interchange of ideas that is vital to self-government" as the Sixth Circuit explained recently in Berry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by umbrella
Finally, with respect to the immigration issue, the court noted that the Ontario Court of Appeal (in its decision in Iantsis (Papatheodorou) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by umbrella
Finally, with respect to the immigration issue, the court noted that the Ontario Court of Appeal (in its decision in Iantsis (Papatheodorou) v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
He is attended by his wife, Jane, and by Bishop Barry Beisner, his successor as the diocesan in Northern California. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]