Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 841 - 860
of 27,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
The Ninth Circuit uses the extrinsic/intrinsic test created in the Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Considering the adverse decision regarding Bridgeport v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:32 pm
It's not every day that a federal court imposes Continuing Legal Education requirements as a sanction to attorneys in a case, but that is what happened in to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach in Fish v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:55 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:10 pm
State of Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
" In State of Indiana v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:10 am
In Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
"Yes, we do this sort of work, but the state also will appoint a lawyer to do it. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:47 pm
Lyons v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:30 am
Currently, businesses must adhere to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Young v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm
The ruling is made that much worse because the Court had before it an example of how the situation should have been handled, in the case of NCTQ v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:33 pm
See Lynas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The ruling came in Lenz v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:04 am
The Supreme Court was required to consider the defence of fair comment in defamation proceedings, in particular the extent to which the factual background giving rise to the comment had to be referred to with the comment itself and be accurately stated. [read post]
