Search for: "United States v. Gross" Results 841 - 860 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
If the failure was so gross as to amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, then Art 3 was engaged. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
If the failure was so gross as to amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, then Art 3 was engaged. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Anthony Colangelo
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
  It's website notes thatIn February, 2009, ZTE Corporation has formally become a member of the United Nations Global Compact. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm by Staley Smith, Quinta Jurecic
The United States has previously insisted that the troops in Iraq are stationed there for advisory roles only. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:18 pm by AALRR
  Notably, the court distinguished a troublesome decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Wang v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
United States Issue: Whether the federal "honest services" fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:20 am by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated more Department of Education (DOE) “for-profit college” student loan funding rules on June 30. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 * Subject to other provisions of law, the neglect or failure of any state or local officer to execute and file his or her oath of office and official undertaking within the time limited therefor by law shall not create a vacancy in the office if such officer was on active duty in the armed forces of the United States and absent from the county of his or her residence at the time of his or her election or appointment. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 * Subject to other provisions of law, the neglect or failure of any state or local officer to execute and file his or her oath of office and official undertaking within the time limited therefor by law shall not create a vacancy in the office if such officer was on active duty in the armed forces of the United States and absent from the county of his or her residence at the time of his or her election or appointment. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 * Subject to other provisions of law, the neglect or failure of any state or local officer to execute and file his or her oath of office and official undertaking within the time limited therefor by law shall not create a vacancy in the office if such officer was on active duty in the armed forces of the United States and absent from the county of his or her residence at the time of his or her election or appointment. [read post]