Search for: "United States v. Wells"
Results 841 - 860
of 28,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
The Court was looking, however, at a state offense, and so had to look to the interpretation of state courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:00 pm
The power of each state to set limits on contributions and expenditures shall extend to all elections in that state, including initiative and referendum elections, as well as the power to lower any federal limits for the election of members of Congress to represent the people of that state. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 6:18 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
In Webb v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
The General Government; Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Constitution of the United States Articles I–III --Notes and Questions --James Madison, The Federalist No. 47 --United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm
Here is the abstract: The self-congratulatory tone of the majority and concurring opinions in last term’s controversial Supreme Court blockbuster, Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If the foreign state is not immune, 1605B also creates a cause of action for nationals of the United States against the foreign state. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
This week the United States Supreme Court issued a key decision in which it struck down a patent covering a medical testing method, holding that the subject matter is ineligible for patenting under Section 101 of the Patent Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
And impeachment was strictly confined to: "civil officers of the United States" as well as the President and Vice President. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
” The statute would therefore outlaw the sale in the United States of a bullfighting video produced in Spain (since bullfighting is not legal in the United States), the sale of any hunting video or magazine in the District of Columbia (since no hunting is allowed in the District) or the sale of a crossbow hunting video or magazine in the many states which allow hunting with compound bows but not with crossbows. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:54 am
Here is the United States’ brief and the parties’ briefs in response: United States’ Amicus Brief Sharp’s Response to United States’ Amicus Brief Tribe’s Response to United States’ Amicus Brief The merits briefs are here. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:55 pm
As he points out, in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
Because, well, the United States is somewhat familiar with that tactic, and screens for it.Even if you use fake names on both the shipper and recipient side. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
