Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 8581 - 8600 of 108,038
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While firing an active and open union supports contemporaneous with their union activity may justify an injunction under the NLRA, it does not appear that Bryson's termination had a negative impact on the union organizing, as employee interest in the union actually increased after Bryson was fired, and the employees voted in the union to represent them.The Court of Appeals finds this is a "unique" case. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Applying the rules of statutory interpretation to this case, the Court of Appeals conclude that the certified question should be answered in the affirmative because the Administrative Code does not consider a mistaken perception of alcoholism to be a disability covered by the NYCHRL. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeal reversed the district court's ruling, in Belmora LLC, v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"  The Court of Appeals cites cases from other circuits on this point, which means the Court is probably saying this for the first time in our circuit.What does it all mean for Ackerman? [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 1:22 pm by Lee Gunn
The First District Court of Appeal has affirmed the agency denial of State Farm's rate increases sought late last year. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Circuit further opined that absent class members may have a sufficient stake to appeal the denial of class certification even if the named plaintiff does not appeal. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:28 am
" The lawsuit, coordinated by the Indiana State Teachers Association, contends that the state does not provide such an education equally to students. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:05 pm
In short, the Court of Appeals upheld section 24 of the N.Y. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:15 pm by Kira Conlon and Lauren Chang
  Specifically, the Court concluded: “CEQA does not require public interest groups such as Save the Hill, which often are unrepresented by counsel at administrative hearings, to do more than fairly apprise the agency of their complaints in order to preserve them for appeal. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:34 am
However, the Court dismissed the petition on its merits, holding that an agency complying with SEQRA does not have to investigate every conceivable environmental problem. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The Court of Appeal has decided that ruling was wrong in law. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:31 am by Christopher Simon
Related Posts: When Does One “Voluntarily” Assume a Risk Under Georgia Law? [read post]