Search for: "People v Long" Results 8581 - 8600 of 18,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm by Josh Blackman
"[T]he remedy for such abusesis to be found at the ballot-box, and in a wholesome public opinion which the representatives of the people will not long, if at all, disregard, and not in the disregard by the judiciary of powers that have been committed to another branch of the government. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
  Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development February 4, 2022 At the invitation of President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm by Cindy Cohn
EFF has long advocated for corporate liability for aiding governmental surveillance, including in the Doe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:19 pm by familoo
It is unfortunate that it has taken so long for people to wake up to it. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
This was a long-running asylum case. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thirty years before Dobbs, the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
If one's best analysis is that the court decided X v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm by Guest Blogger
Law enforcement agencies surely do not have to publish the names of people they are investigating and wire-tapping (with warrants!) [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:10 am by Laura H. Juillet
Last month, we looked at when employer might be deemed to have knowledge of an employee’s disability, discussing (among other cases) the EAT’s decision Gallop v Newport County Council. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm by Ilya Somin
Back in 2012, Supreme Court ruled that the mandate is constitutional in its highly controversial decision in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]