Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 8581 - 8600 of 12,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 3:13 am by SHG
  Via the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, Indiana has "undone" the ruling of its Supreme Court in Barnes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Both state and federal courts in New York favor deciding cases on the merits. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
Growth: There was no pre-cooling step to remove field heat from the cantaloupes before cold storage. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 4:41 am by Tom Cummings
WCAB (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Police) , 11 A.3d 48 (2011), the injured worker, Washington, was employed as a Field Trooper with the  State Police. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by Administrator
The impact of this case has wide implications involving contractor liability, retroactive legislation, inability to assess risks; not only that, it opens the field for other states to re-establish liability on construction professionals long after fairness–or even state statute! [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
ARI has carried out several study programs in the field of sounding rocket’s capabilities and applications, their payloads and [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Charles O'Mahony
  The Report notes that the field is evolving and that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is fuelling a paradigm shift in thinking around how the state responds to persons with mental health problems. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Stone (1936), ‘The Common Law in the United States’ 5. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm
Hofstra paid out $485,000 and a federal judge approved the settlement last November, in Summa v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:01 pm by Ross Frenett
The network will share methods and experiences but also assist the Commission and Member States in preventing terrorism. [read post]