Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 37,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 11:23 am
In a recent decision by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Oumar Dieng v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:54 am
The answer did not specifically allege, and the allegations therein, read in the light most favorable to defendant, did not give rise to an inference, that but for plaintiff’s negligence, defendant would have proceeded to a hearing and prevailed in the underlying OPMC matter, or he would have achieved a more favorable settlement. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 7:57 pm
Davis won in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:00 pm
While red states jockey with each other to see who can pass the strictest abortion law in the hope that theirs will be the one a future Supreme Court uses to overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:53 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia addressed this issue two days ago in PORTCO v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:00 am
Assn. of Rockland, Inc. v Town of Clarkstown, 2017 NY Slip Op 03511, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentUnder the Doctrine of Conflict Preemption, a local law is preempted by a State law when a right or benefit is expressly provided by the State law has been curtailed or taken away by the local law. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:52 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 12:39 am
In a blunt dissent in Genesis Healthcare v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:55 pm
But as even Crowell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
In Matter of Seasia D. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
In Matter of Markowitz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm
Wilinski v. 334 East 92ND Housing Dev. [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:41 am
” Such was the conclusion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Hefferan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 2:13 pm
The arguments in favor of incompatibility are compelling. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
” “”An account stated is an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:12 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
