Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 8581 - 8600 of 19,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2018, 9:50 am by Deborah Pearlstein
  Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 Further, the high recognition factor of the Starbucks marks may make it easier for consumers to realise and understand the use as parody.However, Dumb Starbucks has reproduced Starbucks’ iconic marks in their entirety, in relation to identical goods, in the same product market, for example. [read post]
The conduct complained of in the DC and Nebraska lawsuits traces the pattern outlined by the January 2017 FTC Report as deceptive and misleading under the FTC Act and most state consumer protection laws (that are based on the FTC Act). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:47 am by Morris Turek
”  Although Greenliant filed its trademark application on an intent-to-use basis, it appears from the website that the GREENLIANT mark is already in use in connection with solid-state storage drives, flash memory, and NAND controllers. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:07 am
jovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch, Inc., on a reference from the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Daniel Coles
In Unfiltered v NSLC the heavy lifting was performed at this stage of the analysis. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
" 442 U.S. at 740 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday a unanimous court ruled in Thacker v. [read post]