Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
Therefore, the applicant may file on their own as a self-petitioner. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Since that time almost every major military ally of the United States has revised its policy to allow openly-gay service members, but the political will to change the policy in this country has been lacking. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
As for Apple's astroturfing, it's recently been just absurd.Epic's broad application of Section 1 is supported by the DOJ and the state AGs. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm
” Whether a rational defendant would have gone to trial would depend on how much he valued the ability to stay in the United States, as compared with spending time in prison. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 10:41 am
At the same time, almost every court has referred the issue back to the petitioner's parent institution for a reconsidered CCC date. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm
If that sounds like a lot of patients, consider that in 2011 alone, just in the United States, almost a hundred million prescriptions were written for the drug. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
” Another pending case on point is United Therapeutics v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
United States (Katsas, Pan, Sentelle): This case is the sixth in the series of Bahlul’s CADC challenges to his life sentence for his participation in the 9/11 attacks that was imposed by a military commission. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Sarah Harrington argued for the United States as amicus curiae in support of Chester. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Lessig recently filed an expert opinion in the extradition hearing to support the argument “that the Superseding Indictment and Record of the Case filed by the DOJ do not meet the requirements necessary to support a prima facie case that would be recognized by United States federal law and subject to the US-NZ Extradition Treaty. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:53 am
United States, a forfeiture case being argued the day after this case. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:51 am
The Federal Circuit found that withholding materials during prosecution was intended to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office in part because of Regeneron’s behavior during the infringement litigation. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm
The Civil Service Reform Act (“CLRA”) establishes a comprehensive framework for reviewing adverse personnel actions taken against Federal employees: first, the case goes before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) for hearing, and the employee may then seek appellate review at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court began its analysis of the Director’s arguments by first reviewing the text of Section 145: “An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in an appeal under section 134(a) may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director . . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Oh, by the way, I suppose it also is relevant that the United States Trustee did not object to either Baker Botts’s original fee or the fee it requested for the cost of defending its application, and that the bankruptcy judge rejected all of ASARCO’s challenges to the underlying fee award. [read post]
