Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 8581 - 8600 of 23,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2019, 3:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution…. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983).[6] Blue Shield v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:03 am by Michael Kraut
  A case now before the Supreme Court of the United States could force California and 11 other states to change such laws. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:44 pm
For example, in the United States, those states that have adopted § 2-803 of the Uniform Probate Code would exempt persons who are not “criminally accountable for the felonious and intentional killing of the decedent”. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 505-06, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court then decided that question in the challengers' favor: "[F]reedom of association is never mentioned in the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am by Ruthann Robson
Ruthann Robson The controversial decision of the United States Supreme Court last year in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 1:27 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, where Justice Neil  Gorsuch authored an opinion on behalf of three conservative justices arguing for just that. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The state’s highest court had rejected the very concept in a 2008 case, Janice M. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Tejinder Singh
”  The United States agrees with her, characterizing the state law as “treat[ing] the named beneficiary as a mere conduit for transferring the insurance proceeds to someone lower down in the federal order of precedence,” creating “an intractable conflict with federal law. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
In the infamous ruling, the Supreme Court’s majority opinion said that people of African descent in the United States could not become citizens." [read post]