Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 8601 - 8620 of 23,988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2016, 6:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Even if it were to approve a likely $84 million in relief—a 90 percent discount from the estimated verdict amount of $854.4 million for non-PAGA claims against the rideshare company—the court was unwilling to sign off on a waiver of an additional $1 billion in potential PAGA recovery in exchange for a comparatively paltry $1 million additional payout (O’Connor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by Charlie Dunlap
But I would have also thought the same of criminalizing the teaching of law as “material support,” but the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Bains v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 1:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court found that questions of fact common to the class predominated over individual inquiries (Hutson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:22 am by Eugene Volokh
And it turned out that Matthew Chan had some experience with attempts to restrict speech online — he was the successful defendant in the Chan v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:02 am by Vera Ranieri
Related Cases: Triple7Vaping.com, LLC et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in A Hand of Hope Pregnancy Resource Center v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:55 pm by Pamela Wolf
” The Ninth Circuit has effectively reduced the racially violent symbol to the status of a stray remark, according to the petitioner in Henry v. [read post]
In this regard, it is hoped that the judgment will bring an end to the frequency of appeals concerning PAL, an issue which the Court itself drew attention to in its judgment [81]. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm by Andrew Trask
Rule 23(c)(4) has been been placed under a microscope in the past few years, largely because of the judicial response to the Supreme Court’s Comcast Corp. v. [read post]