Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 8601 - 8620
of 9,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am
AEDPA precludes federal habeas relief when a state court has adjudicated a federal claim on its merits, unless the state court ruling was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
” Solicitor General’s PerspectiveMalcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, supporting neither party’s theory. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:30 am
Co. of America v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:39 am
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, ... [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:19 am
Ferguson the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Louisiana statute mandating separate but (in reality not) equal railway accommodations for black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Circuit released its opinion in Al Bihani v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm
The Supreme Court asked the United States for its view on whether cert should be granted on the questions the NFL wanted answered. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
As evidence, he notes that the Court has released only four opinions thus far, and has still not issued an opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:45 am
., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
The boys were subsequently sentenced to life in prison and their cases are now before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
v=PlpBB4o8xq8 [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
