Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 21,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Back in 2004, Californian state senator Kevin Murray wrote this in a report in US recording industry practices:“Much like the public generally dislikes politicians, but love their individual representatives, Artists have respect for their record company handlers, but distrust the companies themselves and the system they operate under. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:04 pm
In an unusual twist, though, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
The case is The Medicines Company v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Recently, this issue was examined by the court in the case of LH v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Parker — whether the town of Pender, Nebraska, is located within the boundaries of an Indian reservation, so that local liquor stores must pay a tribal tax on their sales Sturgeon v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 10:20 am
In Pucci v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
The LawArticle 6 of the InfoSoc Directive states: Obligations as to technological measures1. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 1:42 pm
Case Background: In Orthofix, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:21 pm
Bickham v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
One straw that generic drug plaintiffs have grasped at is the footnote in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 10:57 pm
The case, Lankford v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
Coskey’s Television & Radio Sales & Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:02 am
In O’Bannon v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:30 pm
Micjo, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:30 pm
Micjo, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:53 pm
The defendants later filed a second motion to dismiss, alleging that the remaining two claims were time-barred, and the fourth claim, for breach of the Municipal Code, failed to state a claim. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
See Messer v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
