Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 32,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:21 am
The court adds: “To the extent Airbnb views the California decisions as ‘outliers,’ it mischaracterizes the state of the law. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:45 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
Key issues and decision of the Court: Maintainability of the suit The GI Act, 1999 (“GI Act”) came into force only on 15 September 2003. [read post]
7 May 2019, 1:54 pm
The case, Frasier v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:48 am
Under the Feres doctrine, members of the United States armed forces are barred from making a claim against the United States for personal injury or death arising “incident to service. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
These deviations from the “textbook” legislative process have allowed Congress to remain reasonably productive in the face of rising partisan rancor, mitigating the efficiency costs of Article I, Section 7’s bicameralism and presentment requirements.While the Supreme Court still refuses to declare partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional and the Elections Clause still gives “the Legislature” of “each State” primary responsibility for congressional… [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am
" To comply with the legislative objective of Civil Rights Law §50-a, explained the court, the custodian of the record must demonstrate a "substantial and realistic potential" for the unredacted reports to be used against the officers in a harassing or abusive manner.Citing Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc. v De Blasio, 169 AD3d at 519, the Appellate Division concluded that the nature and a facility's use of unusual incident… [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am
" To comply with the legislative objective of Civil Rights Law §50-a, explained the court, the custodian of the record must demonstrate a "substantial and realistic potential" for the unredacted reports to be used against the officers in a harassing or abusive manner.Citing Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc. v De Blasio, 169 AD3d at 519, the Appellate Division concluded that the nature and a facility's use of unusual incident… [read post]
5 May 2019, 10:39 am
”This exclusion is nowhere stated in the White Paper. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
Other areas of law think that law should pick extreme solutions, forcing information out of people who are “normal”—depends on the costs and benefits of revelation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:15 am
Under Graham v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
In 1925, in its decision in Gitlow v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:30 am
” However, on May 21, 2018, the Supreme Court held in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” By forcing applicants to comply with the law of the country of subsequent filing, these principles are in jeopardy. [read post]
1 May 2019, 1:38 pm
Spy Dialer, Inc. v. [read post]
