Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 8621 - 8640 of 10,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Accidents: First paradigm of invention is inventor sitting around, thinking, conceiving of a compound: A+B=C, forming a complete mental picture of C. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Gregory Bacon (Bristows)
Multiple parallel cases This was an interesting feature of the Ocado v AutoStore litigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
It is also generally recognised in English law that a claim for unjust enrichment has four elements: (a) enrichment of the defendant; (b) “at the expense” of the claimant; (c) an unjust factor and (d) defences, if any, such as change of position. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  Citing Timberlane, the Court balanced five factors with respect to comity: (1) the vital national interests of each state; (b) the extent and the nature of the hardship that inconsistent enforcement actions would impose upon the defendant; (c) the extent to which the required conduct is to take place in the territory of the other state; (d) the nationality of the person; and (e) the extent to which enforcement by action of either state can reasonably be expected to… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Depending on the circumstances and nature of each case, the judge may: (a) explain the process; (b) inquire whether both parties understand the process and the procedure; (c) make referrals to agencies able to assist the litigant in the preparation of the case; (d) provide information about the law and evidentiary requirements; (e) modify the traditional order of taking evidence; and (f) question witnesses. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  Citing Timberlane, the Court balanced five factors with respect to comity: (1) the vital national interests of each state; (b) the extent and the nature of the hardship that inconsistent enforcement actions would impose upon the defendant; (c) the extent to which the required conduct is to take place in the territory of the other state; (d) the nationality of the person; and (e) the extent to which enforcement by action of either state can reasonably be expected to… [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/Reports.aspx (d) Read about the mandate, activities and work of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, consisting of five independent experts. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:05 am by Nico Cordes
"c) "The request to contact the applicant on the phone in case any outstanding objections remain 'which may be usefully dealt with by telephone' is not granted as the telephone consultation cannot bring the present proceedings forward".d) "As the applicant did not request the oral proceedings at any point of the written procedure, it is concluded that the applicant's right to be heard has been entirely respected (Article 113(1)… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:09 am
Días después, Wikileaks facilitó un motor de búsqueda de los documentos. [read post]