Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 29,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
Now, the theory goes, several Applications are being filed for a single individual breaking out separate claims for specific and continuous trauma injuries.I haven't seen any studies or reports to validate this, but it would seem reasonable that the measuring methodology may be flawed in that we're counting "injuries" rather than "injured" and that the "increase in claims frequency" is really just an increase in the amount of paperwork being filed.Take a look… [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
To require the Corps to undertake review of the entire valley fill project as a part of the Section 404 permit action would render WVDEP's review under SMCRA "at best duplicative, and, at worst, meaningless. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Paul, mn : West, [2013]©2013TZ2 M992 2013 Family Law Forensic psychology consultation in child custody litigation : a handbook for work product review, case preparation, and expert testimony / Philip M. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:29 am
The Ohio Supreme Court refused review. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:52 am
This just in: The Section on Family and Juvenile Law is pleased to announce a Call for Papers for both the main program panel and the pedagogy panel at the upcoming AALS 2025 Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-10-18 http://t.co/fLXIX1Pwvp -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-10-18: Cyberbullying bill inches closer to law despite priva… http://t.co/Jt8xEVdzzh -> Cambridge, Oxford, Sage v GSU Appeals court overturns finding of fair use http://t.co/QF45fOhUbQ -> Negative online reviews can lead to threats of legal action from targeted businesses http://t.co/HtNAiZqizF -> How… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm
We predict a request for California Supreme Court review is coming, so even though the opinion is s a long read, it's worth it if you are interested in this issue. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:29 pm
In the new Georgia Supreme Court Family Law case the court reviewed that issue. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:17 am
Concepcion, forthcoming in Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:03 am
William Wood has published “The (Potential) Legal History of Indian Gaming” in the Arizona Law Review. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
As a result, Sanchez became a vehicle for the Supreme Court instead to revisit what it means for a contract to be "unconscionable" under California law. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
The court further found that adjudicating the dispute would require the court to determine whether tribal law authorized defendants to publish the Order and disenroll plaintiffs, “which itself requires an impermissible analysis of Tribal law and constitutes a determination of a non-justiciable inter-tribal dispute. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:59 pm
The form of streamlined review includes a limited Initial Study or environmental impact review (EIR.) [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:16 pm
This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to decide the constitutionality of a Kansas law on voter registration and a California law on union organizing. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Please subscribe to keep up with this and other Construction Law Musings. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm
We have refuted this argument previously, and it is soundly put to rest in a comprehensive law review article by Mark W. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
” ICYMI, last week the California Law Review hosted a symposium on Amanda Tyler's Habeas Corpus in Wartime (Oxford University Press). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:14 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, the Court examined the viability of class action waivers in the face of claims that the defendants’ negligence led to an outbreak of COVID-19. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:42 pm
While at USF Law, Matt was a two-year member of the USF Law Review, as well as a CALI award recipient (Top Student) in Contracts. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 1:49 pm
After reviewing the case, the court concluded that Gadbois's employer was not liable for Fields' injuries. [read post]
