Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 41,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 4:35 am
As IPKat readers will remember, this echoes earlier CJEU (twin) decisions in Cases C-70/10 Scarlet [here] and C-360/10 Netlog [here]. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 12:26 pm
The two rates, 10 and 20 percent, are marginal tax rates, because they are applied within their brackets, and the higher rate only applies to the "next dollar" of income earned, not to all previous dollars.This means that a person who has $15,001 of taxable income will pay 10 percent on the first $15,000 ($1500 tax) and 20 percent only on that last dollar ($0.20 tax), for a total of $1500.20. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 12:39 am
In accordance with Article 24(1) REE and the established jurisprudence of the Disciplinary Board of Appeal (following decisions D 1/92, OJ EPO 1993, 357, and D 6/92, OJ EPO 1993, 361), decisions of the Examination Board may in principle only be reviewed for the purposes of establishing that they do not infringe the REE, the provisions relating to its application, or higher-ranking law. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Does It Matter That Its Funders Are White? [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
It does not matter that is made indirectly. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:28 pm
(Montana does not levy a general statewide sales tax.) [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Section 68.2(1) does not provide a collective infringement remedy.[8] The result was that the Supreme Court found that Access Copyright could not enforce its tariffs against non-licensees, such as York, and, further, since Access Copyright does not have an assignment of copyright from the copyright owners, Access Copyright could not sue York for any alleged infringement. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
As my dad always told me: ‘ask a silly question…’ Question 1: What does the family justice system mean to you? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
The Tribunal held that, in order to avoid a breach of Article 10 on the grounds of proportionality, the restriction in s32(1) should be limited so that it no longer has effect once a reasonable time has passed after the exhaustion or abandonment of any appeal. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 10:32 am
Does the Form BE-12 reporting requirement apply to any US business merely if 10% or more of its voting interests are held by a foreign person at the end of the relevant period? [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Figure 1. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 11:30 pm
"1....2.....3......Highways jammed with broken heroes on a last chance power drive. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Companies continue to scramble to respond to the new Dodd-Frank whistleblower program, which provides a direct line to the SEC for allegations of fraud, and a potential bounty of 10 to 30 percent for penalties collected over $1 million. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 7:51 am
The good news is that this does not affect the amounts that the company can raise in other exempt (non-crowdfunding) offerings during that same 12-month period. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board does not have any criticism against the OD’s approach. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:48 pm
A First Degree Misdemeanor is punishable by a maximum of 1 year jail, 1 year probation, and/or $1,000 fine. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:48 pm
A First Degree Misdemeanor is punishable by a maximum of 1 year jail, 1 year probation, and/or $1,000 fine. [read post]
