Search for: "J. C." Results 8621 - 8640 of 19,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2014, 7:47 am by Andrew Weber
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z A Afghanistan Algeria American Samoa Argentina Australia Austria B Bangladesh Bolivia Botswana Brazil C Cambodia Cameroon… [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:11 am
 This morning the Court issued its decision in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG [not yet available -- press release here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from Germany's Bundesgerichtshof, seeking clarification as to the meaning and scope of relevant exception(s) under Directive 2001/29/EC (the InfoSoc Directive).BackgroundAs this blog reported at the time when the case was refereed, the background proceedings… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Craig, 2009 SCC 23, [2009] 1 SCR 762 [1] Abella J. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:27 pm by Mary Whisner
Rough, Carrier: Untangling the Danger in My DNA,catalog recordJames C. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
The concept of common general knowledge (CGK) occupies a more prominent position in the UK’s inventive step regime than it does in the European Patent Office's (EPO) problem-and-solutionapproach or the classic U.S. analysis in Graham v John Deere. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm by Beth Van Schaack
  The event—co-hosted by IntLawGrrls, the Robert J. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
This is the question which the IPKat posed last Friday, on learning that Case C-661/13 Astellas Pharma Inc. v Polpharma SA Pharmaceutical Works, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of some questions relating to the so-called Bolar exemption, which spares some sorts of use of someone else's patent for experimental purposes from being a patent infringement. [read post]