Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 36,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2020, 2:56 am
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
The Dutch Supreme Court made a reference for a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice (‘CJEU’) (case C-186/19). [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
” Next, under the heading “[c]hild [s]upport, etc. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Justice Côté is dissenting. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:25 pm
In Alabama, failure to register is considered a Class C felony, which means it’s punishable by up to 10 years in prison. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that, in a proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation and custody under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct the “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel and expert fees under Domestic Relations Law § 237 before that party has been adjudicated a parent. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm
SS&C Technology Holdings v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm
SS&C Technology Holdings v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The article then goes on to list three actions as the basis for that charge: (a) directing the White House to defy a subpoena for documents; (b) directing executive branch agencies and offices to defy subpoenas for documents; and (c) directing current and former executive branch officials “not to cooperate with the Committees” and to defy subpoenas for testimony. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:32 am
§ 1002.85(c). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:57 am
Section 1(a)(3) of the resolution provides that in “matters of imminent armed attacks, the executive branch should indicate to Congress why military action was necessary within a certain window of opportunity, the possible harm that missing the window would cause, and why the action was likely to prevent future disastrous attacks against the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:05 am
We hold accordingly that the undisputed material facts in the summary judgment record demonstrate as a matter of law that Jehovah’s Witnesses were not mandatory reporters under § 41-3-201, MCA, in this case because their church doctrine, canon, or practice required that clergy keep reports of child abuse confidential, thus entitling the Defendants to the exception of § 41-3-201(6)(c), MCA. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:41 am
In the Matter of Jason C. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:30 pm
Apart from mere tweaks of wording and numbering, substantive differences are: Part 3 now aims to ensure that where “cases where human rights, public law or equality law matters are or may be raised, the necessary information is before the Court at the first hearing”. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
From a legal perspective, where the arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
From a legal perspective, where the arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
From a legal perspective, where the arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
From a legal perspective, where the arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
C. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:08 am
” The amicus brief reads this language as being “[c]onsistent with the settled understanding” that method of treatment claims are patent-eligible and as signaling that the Supreme Court “appeared to take as its premise that methods of medical treatment are patent-eligible. [read post]
