Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 16,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
In the case of Dickerson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The Court of Appeal reversed the District Court’s decision, and granted the accused’s request. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:49 am
Patents can be – and have been – validly granted for inventions that had been known and used by one or more other people prior to the later inventor filing a patent application. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:20 pm
Almost twice as many people in the first group responded that Bob Marley (or his heirs) had granted permission for the t-shirt to be sold as compared to the other group. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
On these GitHub pages, people from Uber can work on the code collaboratively. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
Glover v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:13 pm
Another classic is Noble v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:26 pm
In Beavers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:20 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:58 am
The lower court failed to consider all of the evidence in the record in granting the employer’s summary judgment motion, and impermissibly “credited the evidence of the employer—the party seeking summary judgment—and failed to properly acknowledge key evidence offered by the party opposing that motion,” the appeals court had found (Jacobs v. [read post]
“Copyright law serves public ends by providing individuals with an incentive to pursue private ones”
16 Mar 2015, 5:13 am
In US v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:44 am
" See Great Coastal Exp., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Petersen v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
As a Legal Post article discussing Tossonian v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 4:33 pm
This rule changed with the Kentucky Supreme Court’s opinion in Gentry v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
In this ruling, following the court decision in Trumpf Medical Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
