Search for: "State v West" Results 8621 - 8640 of 9,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area Agencies on Aging (C4A) 980 Ninth… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:10 am by V.Venkatesan
State of West Bengal & Anr. (1975) 2 SCR 674“The Government is a government of laws and not of men. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am by Davidson Stephanie
For example, if you’re reading an opinion that has a reference to Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:03 am by asam90
In practice, however, U.N. bodies have requested advisory opinions in situations where there is an underlying dispute between states. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Circuit that’s plainly out of step with recent Supreme Court decisions, which show less deference to agency authority (like the Axon decision just last week, or last year’s West Virginia v. [read post]