Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 25,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am
We live in a world of e-mails, IMs, texts, Snapchats, TikToks, Instagrams and the occasional fax. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Gregory ValenzaThe Daily Journal2 November 2007REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:47 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Barr v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 6:31 am
Frigaliment Importing Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:09 am
On June 25, 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB’s) Consumer Complaint Database went live to provide the general public with enhanced access to consumer complaints. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:39 pm
Apologies for this going live a bit later than normal, but we’re here with today’s Top 10 nonetheless. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:09 am
This was stated in 1991, in the Houston Texas Court of Appeals case, Interstate Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:51 am
Slagle v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 7:59 pm
OK, I may be a little biased, having grown up (and now living) minutes from the town. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
But Chambers does not go so far as to hold that a defendant is denied a fair opportunity to defend himself whenever a state rule excludes favorable evidence, see United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
Acruff-Rose Music, which was about the 2 Live Crew's rap parody of Roy Orbison's Pretty Woman. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:06 am
Recently, Justice Arnold in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch) held that 8 second cricket clips infringed copyright in broadcasts of matches, discussed here in a Kat post.Agon also stated that rival website Chessbomb had created an app that allowed spectators of live matches to leak the moves. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Board of Education and Tinker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Justice Powell’s law clerk, Larry Hammond, brought to Powell’s attention a Connecticut case, decided in September 1972, that picked viability—when the fetus can live outside the womb—as the point during a pregnancy when it could be said, without much debate, that the state’s interest in protecting the fetus became compelling. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
This Court’s decision is the culmination of a lengthy lawsuit, The Matter of 677 New Loudon Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In either scenario, however, there is still a live possibility that individuals think for themselves and maintain the beliefs to which they are committed. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
That court agreed with the plaintiffs, Republican voters who lived in the district, that the state intentionally diluted their votes. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
[Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that Kennedy’s opinion in Murr v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
OpinionShort Title/District 07a0467p.06 Pepaj v. [read post]
