Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 11:33 am
Moreover, in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
At the reception, the AAABA board will present the proclamation to Fred’s son, Ken – a well-known speaker on the Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
People of the State of California v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 5:23 pm
And so a jury verdict for the United States against a landlord is good news. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am
” Finally, the Court rejected Siegel’s reliance (seconded by the United States Trustee) on its 2007 decision in Marrama v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:12 am
United States, the question was about the ability of the police to use probable cause to search a motor vehicle when its driver appears to have committed a non-moving parking infraction. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
The case is the United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
(collectively, “Shasta”) appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiffs LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. and LifeScan, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
The justification for this immunity, as every student in Intro to Constitutional Law knows, is federal supremacy: John Marshall treated the Second Bank of the United States as a federal agency ("instrumentality") that had to be utterly independent of state control. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
["A recent case worth noting is University of Southern California v. [read post]
