Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8621 - 8640 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:52 am by Gene Quinn
Just over three years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Ryan Gibson
  Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States * * *. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:42 pm by Randy Barnett
By contrast, in the United States, if each individual citizen is sovereign, so too are their offspring “natural born citizens. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am by Gene Quinn
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 10:33 am by Florian Mueller
Software patents are the law of the land, in the United States and the whole industrialized world. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
  The next stop for the photographer would be the United States Supreme Court since there are First Amendment free speech and free exercise claims. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
In general, that means the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), which has led the development of e-commerce law in the world. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:00 pm by Trey Childress
As readers of this blog are aware, the United States Supreme Court in the recent case of Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]