Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8621 - 8640 of 10,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
  It is certainly evidence of a crisis among the ruling elites in China; a crisis that parallels that in the United States about the legitimacy and character of the founding ideology of the state and its political order. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am by Paula Bremner
Multi-Jurisdictional Relief The Aker v Neptune case provides a practical example of the current multiple forms of relief concurrently available to both patentee and infringer, particularly following new “challenge” procedures introduced by the United States Patent and Trade-mark Office (“USPTO”) last September 2012. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1971) ("Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against constitutional validity. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am by Jay McDaniel
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
English: 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States  CNN Broadcasting Inc. won dismissal of defamation claims by the Trump campaign related to an article discussing the prospect for Russian election interference, after the Northern District of Georgia found the campaign didn’t adequately allege that CNN acted with malice. [read post]