Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 9,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
A landmark Supreme Court decision in 1915 – United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
For example, an Arizona jury awarded a homeowner and his family more than $4 million for a case where the insurance carrier delayed remediating mold contamination (Hatley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:36 am
Supreme Court upheld Arizona’s congressional map, declaring the use of an independent redistricting commission that drew House district lines in the 2012 cycle did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
Ireland In the case of McDonagh v Sunday Newspapers Limited [2017] IESC 46 the Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal was incorrect to overturn a High Court jury’s finding of fact in a defamation case against the Sunday World. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:04 am
Lobbyists and activists are pressing for similar rules in Ohio, Florida, Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:04 am
Lobbyists and activists are pressing for similar rules in Ohio, Florida, Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm
Under its "state action doctrine," the Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment applies to government actions toward citizens. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:21 am
Soltes (Harvard Business School), on Monday, May 27, 2019 Tags: Compliance & ethics, Corporate fraud, Executive Compensation, Global Settlement, Misconduct, Securities enforcement Review and Predictions: 2019 Federal Securities Litigation and Regulation Posted by Jason Halper, Kyle DeYoung, and Adam Magid, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, on Monday, May 27, 2019 Tags: Insider trading, Merger litigation, Mergers &… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
This is interesting in light of Arizona v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:49 pm
The US Supreme Court refused to consider the case of a former Phoenix, Arizona, high school teacher sentenced to 200 years in prison for possessing child pornography. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:38 am
Rose, University of Arizona and Yale Law School, author of Property and Persuasion "A magnificent and exquisitely told story, replete with scoundrels and corrupt politicians, Lakefront solves the longstanding puzzle of the origins of the Supreme Court's famous nineteenth-century ruling in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
According to the judge, the Arizona Supreme Court’s policy is that a previously purchased vacation plane ticket isn’t sufficient cause to continue a trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 12:01 pm
Finally, if the next two Supreme Court decisions go the way I hope, the FTC will finally have to coordinate its privacy enforcement efforts with CISA's cybersecurity standards and priorities. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
., 79 Ariz. 253 (1955), the leading case in this area, the Supreme Court of Arizona rejected the argument that defendants now press: [W]e fail to understand why, as a practical matter, an employer will refuse to adopt such rules when by their adoption and enforcement the accident would not occur - at least through fault of the employer's servants. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
The 11th Circuit held for the King estate based on the Georgia Supreme Court’s interpretation of Georgia’s right of publicity including the ability of heirs to assert the rights of a deceased person. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court case decided in 2010, long-standing election laws capped election spending. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:51 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:12 am
And for other reasons: As of last November, CBS (CBSA) was still disclosing the impact of Janet Jackson’s 2004 halftime-show wardrobe malfunction (an initial $550,000 forfeiture levied against the company by the Federal Communications Commission was vacated by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and the FCC has sought Supreme Court review). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:31 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that child pornography is not subject to the same First Amendment protections as adult pornography, since it is assumed that the child is being abused. [read post]
