Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 29,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 5:52 pm
A “Hotbox” Of Legal Issues: California’s Workplace Marijuana Laws – Sacramento lawyer Geoff Westbrook of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s California Peculiarities Employment Law Blog Vivek Ranadivé and Wisconsin IA Both Big into Cherrypicking, According to Sources – Raleigh attorney David Smyth of Brooks Pierce on their blog, Cady Bar the Door Google Considers Truth, Accuracy for Search Rankings… [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 6:18 am
Webcast Highlights + Overview of new and pending state privacy laws in California, Virginia, Colorado, and more.+ Rising public expectations and awareness of privacy practices post-breaches.+ Spotlight on laws addressing biometric data collection and usage.+ Big tech facing expanded scrutiny and potential antitrust actions.+ Global regulations like GDPR influencing US companies and best practices.+ Enhanced enforcement creating real risks and costs around non-compliance. +… [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 2:09 pm
Andrew Cohen has a good Bench Conference today on last week's California federal court decision lambasting lethal injunction. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:41 am
On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court handed down another employee-friendly opinion, ruling that premium pay for missed meal and rest periods are wages under California law, subject to the same timing and reporting rules as other forms of compensation. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:00 am
Dailey filed his petition for review in the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2013. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:30 am
Last month, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York posted on its website a paper written by Robert Hockett, a professor of financial and monetary law at Cornell Law School, and a recent visiting scholar at the New York Fed. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:15 am
The Law Offices of Edward A. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:08 am
Whether a duty exists is a matter of law, based on the particular activity and the parties’ relationship to the activity. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
We suggest reviewing these state codes yourself, either by visiting your local library, or by using our Guide to Law Online page to find the statutes online. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am
California (Indian Gaming Compact, Breach of)Davilla v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2017.html The following articles were added: Truth and reconciliation commissions: A needed force in Alaska? [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
Here are some of the latest materials related to Indian Law. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:52 am
CalChamber Involvement CalChamber involvement in the case dates back to October 2011, when the CalChamber filed a letter urging the appeal court to review the trial court’s erroneous decision that the practice of rounding employee time entries to the nearest 6 minutes violated California law. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Since then Hayward has been repeatedly turned down by California governors. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:47 am
Less comprehensive in scope than the much-heralded CCPA, the Nevada privacy law amendment has received significantly less attention than its California counterpart. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
• A case enforcing a foreign arbitration and choice-of-law clause prospectively waiving a seaman’s federal statutory rights, even though there was little possibility for a subsequent review of the arbitration award. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
See California, 593 U. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:34 pm
Indeed, until Monday, the California libel retraction statute (Cal. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
The Bureau of Land Management conducted environmental review of the project under National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), and the County conducted environmental review of only the reclamation plan under California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:25 am
The California state courts rejected that claim, relying on a series of California cases holding that those limits do not apply when a fee is imposed by a generally applicable law. [read post]
