Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 8641 - 8660 of 10,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2009, 5:15 pm
And so the panel, by a vote of 2-1, refused to order the transfer of the domain name to AAA.So does this decision represent a turn in the thinking of UDRP panelists regarding the business model of pay-per-click advertising? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:20 pm
It seems to me that the design in question is indeed so simple as to be the cheapest way to provide the particular utilitarian features of a bird feeder.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:42 am
FTC Staff Revises Online Behavioral Advertising Principles (2/2/09). [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:19 am
Here is an Abstract of the paper: July 15, 2009 Abstract: Defining and Measuring Judicial Activism: An Empirical Study of Judges on the United States Court of Appeals Corey Rayburn Yung The John Marshall Law School Existing empirical scholarship about judicial activism has almost exclusively focused on 1) the United States Supreme Court; and 2) actions by the judiciary which invalidate legislative, executive, and state actions. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 1:30 am
Here is the abstract:Existing empirical scholarship about judicial activism has almost exclusively focused on 1) the United States Supreme Court; and 2) actions by the judiciary which invalidate legislative, executive, and state actions. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   United Kingdom KCI foam dressing patent held valid, but does anyone know what happened? [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
It seems clear that, once a product is covered by a utility patent, a trademark applicant is going to have a heck of a time convincing the Board that the product design somehow qualifies for a trademark registration.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
The court found that the V3 product infringes JVW’s patent, while the V4 product does not. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:21 pm
" When I cover the plain view doctrine in class, I use this example to illustrate how it works: Officers are executing a warrant to search John Doe's home for stolen TV sets. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:08 am by Coco Soodek
Allegedly, Robert De Niro and John McEnroe were victims. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:19 am by justinsilverman
There must be (1) a false and defamatory statement of fact concerning another, (2) an unprivileged publication to a third party and (3) fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher. [read post]