Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 8641 - 8660 of 9,856
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
In October 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision concerning the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws, Morrison v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
United States (1997), to be an “inferior officer” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause, the work of the officer must be “supervised and directed at some level by others who were appointed by Presidential nomination with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Lash Group Inc., 9th Cir., No. 08-35619, Nov. 18, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit took a dramatic step towards preserving the rights of False Claims Act (FCA) defendants. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
There is little prospect that state execution is in any imminent constitutional danger, because it is unlikely that a Supreme Court of John Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. will soon acknowledge the failure of the Gregg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:30 pm
Circuit to dispense with the court's usual opening cry-- "God save the United States and this Honorable Court" prior to appellate arguments in the case. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  Javaid Iqball and other detainees filed suit in the United States District Court in New York City against former U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:50 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument on a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
In anticipation of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]