Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 17,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
After a jury convicted Baldhir Sood of one count of computer fraud, in violation of Kansas Statutes § 21–3755 and one count of attempted theft, in violation of Kansas Statutes §§ 21–3301 and 21–3701, he appealed. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
I missed the first one, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:13 am
In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Gall v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:30 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:30 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
Herbert Hovenkamp, the Ben V. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:38 pm
Green Card And The Benefits Of Permanent Residency In The U.S.What NY Businesses Should Learn From the United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:57 am
While the International Court of Justice declined to give retroactive effect to a Security Council resolution in Libya v U.K. (1998), U.N. practice has at times given effect to the said retroactive resolutions. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:19 am
This week's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:50 am
First: In White v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:49 pm
State of N.M. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:55 am
The first case, Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:03 pm
Buckles v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm
As such, as per Forcelux Ltd v Binnie (2009) EWCA Civ 854, whether conceived as counterclaim or defence, it would be counted as success at trial. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
How many cases must a law target to count as general? [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am
On this week’s National Security Law Podcast, Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck closed out 2018 with a deep dive into the state secrets privilege: Zach ZhenHe Tan surveyed the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jesner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Not a single Southwesterner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California does not count). [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
You can't pick and choose what parts count and which parts don't count." [read post]
