Search for: "State v. Field" Results 8641 - 8660 of 12,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Exhibit A of this phenomenon in Tuerkheimer‘s article is the initial Sixth Circuit opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:00 am by Steve Vladeck
And we should hear soon from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which heard argument in April in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:01 am
The authorities of Aerotel v Telco Holdings Ltd (see katpost here) and Symbian Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents (katpost here) were solemnly invoked [if you're really interested, one of the all-time great katposts, by our former and much-admired colleague David Pearce -- a.k.a. the legendary Tufty -- should be perused here]. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012, Boasberg,… [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is Baker Hughes Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Moreover, the lawsuits and changes that ended use of many adult corrections practices among juveniles were largely spawned from reporting from people like Mike Ward, for example in a 2007 article voicing extensive criticisms of pepper spray use in juvenile facilities.Further, the 1984 Morales v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm by INFORRM
   It is wholly unclear whether this clause is intended to change the position at common law as set out in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group ([2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)). [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
Rogovoy stated: "I never mentioned any of the people: the defendant, the witnesses. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
Rogovoy stated: "I never mentioned any of the people: the defendant, the witnesses. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 12:35 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Invention assignment agreements are often important for employees who work in a highly technical field, creating patentable or trade secret material used to give a company a competitive advantage. [read post]
12 May 2012, 7:36 pm by Schachtman
Evid. 702, Advisory Committee Notes to 2000 Amendments; see also United States v. [read post]