Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8641 - 8660 of 10,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Roberto M. Suárez
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  Decisions to expand a manufacturer's post-sale duty beyond making reasonable efforts to warn product users about newly discovered dangers should be left to administrative agencies, which are better able to weigh the costs and benefits of such action.Id. at 284-85 (lots of citations and quotation marks omitted).Courts in fully half the states in the country have considered whether to recognize a duty to recall this or that kind of product. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am by Erica Canas
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
Panama already exports most of its goods to the United States duty-free under our trade preference programs. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
The text - following on the heels of the Citizenship Clause's grant of national birthright citizenship - provides that "[n]o State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 690 F.2d 1368, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:28 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  The judgment to be appealed is that of the Court of Appeal Civil Division in Ministry of Defence v AB and others[2010] EWCA Civ 1317 – (Smith and Leveson LJJ and Sir Mark Waller). [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:04 am by Benjamin Wittes
The main problem with Guantánamo, we suggested, was not that the United States was detaining people as “enemy combatants” but that it was not detaining the “right people. [read post]