Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 8641 - 8660 of 24,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm by Rick Garnett
Today, he is a litigant in the Supreme Court of the United States and regarded by many as embodying the tension – increasingly, the conflict – between religious conscience and equality. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers, Stephanie Zable
Without going into detail, the government states that limits were placed both on what DreamHost is required to produce and on what the government is allowed to seize. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
Now Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit has written a concurrence in a decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
Kovačić via a text message and Facebook message that she planned to remain in the United States with N.K, contrary to their agreement before the trip. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Fa urges the court to grant one of these First Amendment cert petitions, a challenge to Minnesota’s ban on political apparel at polling places across the state. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Luciana was temporarily permitted to be in the United States on a student visa, did not have a job, and did not have a place for the children to stay. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am by Garrett Hinck
The United States and Turkey have both asked the Kurds to postpone the vote in the interest of stabilizing Iraqi politics. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm by Lisa Ouellette
But the Court’s decision said nothing about the argument of the United States as amicus curiae that official immunity should still be available, so this issue remains undetermined. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am by Vanita Gupta
United States (upholding Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a lawful exercise of Congress’ enforcement power under the commerce clause), the primary purpose of banning discrimination in public places is “the vindication of human dignity and not mere economics. [read post]