Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 60,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 8:40 am
Last month, in the case of Solis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm
Nothing in Article V grants Congress that power, and it is difficult to see Congress doing so when roughly forty states would have less influence under such a system than under one-state-one vote. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Meyer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:37 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:40 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:27 am
Today we commemorate the 47th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:24 am
The Court of Appeals agrees that plaintiff cannot state a prima facie case because all she did was give her employer three notes from a nurse practitioner stating "off work DBL," "continue DBL," and "continue disability. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
David NosalUnited States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
"The Second Circuit held years ago (Haley v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
The Supreme Court ruled today, in Southern Union v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
” (Morehart v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
That does not suggest to the majority that it should treat all state-created works as copyrightable. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
United States v Pickett, E. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:30 pm
Williams v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am
The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am
The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
