Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 21,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm
Salamea v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
S19(9) of the Local Government Act 1989, argued by FRE, was simply not relevant as it did not create a right to judicial review where that would not otherwise be the case: In principle it cannot be right to permit a claimant suing a public body for breach of contract to invoke public law, for as Neuberger LJ (as he then was) stated in Supportways v Hampshire CC, [2006] LGR 837: “If he could do so, it would place a party who contracts with a public body in an… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Martin Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:26 am
The NHS Trust v Baby X case - see below. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:34 am
The English law – in common with that in a number of other jurisdictions – prevents public bodies from suing for libel (see Derbyshire County Council v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
In Torres v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:15 pm
First, it seeks to return to the to Kreiner v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:38 am
The body of the advertisement stated: `Open Minded Mom looking to share intimate family fun. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
Say, for example, that your party has 222 seats on a particular legislative body that has a total of 435 seats. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm
The Hon’ble Single Judge of the Delhi High Court relied primarily on two decisions with regard to comparative advertising - De Beers Abrasive v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
Both the immediate stakes and the lineup in Murthy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:03 am
When Ericsson brought the motion, it assumed that--should the motion be granted--Luo would be a total non-issue or Ericsson could focus its trial depositions on the reasons for which the PTAB would have deemed Apple's Luo-based theories unconvincing.Ericsson's position that Apple tactically delayed the rescission of the stipulation--and that this constitutes gamesmanship that no court or, as in this case, quasi-judicial body should reward--is understandable. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:22 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC19074 - State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
This case concerned asymmetric comparison (which Lindsay helpfully termed “comparing apples v pears”). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
The definition of “trade secret” was not bad, he added, predicting that it will signal the demise of a whole body of built-up “breach of confidence” UK case law. [read post]
