Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 13,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Moreover, Pappas’s speech was anonymous, “occur[ring] away from the office on [his] own time. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:57 pm
Retrial Date Set in RIAA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
The Court also denied cert. in Beard v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Consider, for example, Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
We will illustrate our position with discussions of the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction, Article I qualifications, and more. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am
Bansal v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am
Bansal v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 7:20 am
East Bay Drywall, LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged without the state to… [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
” The Supreme Court’s 1984 decision, Chevron v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
” The Biden administration agreed that the Supreme Court should put the 5th Circuit’s ruling on hold, stressing that the Supreme Court has “long applied a strong presumption in favor of allowing a challenged statute to remain in effect pending judicial review,” particularly when two other federal courts of appeals have upheld the same enforcement provisions. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Henry v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 5:00 pm
Rose v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 5:00 pm
Rose v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 5:00 pm
Rose v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
Following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
