Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 30,500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am
” The debate over the use of social science and statistics at the oral argument in Schuette v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:58 am
It is inimical to the fundamental principles which we rightly cherish of open justice and, above all, procedural fairness. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:42 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:30 am
The court held for the taxpayers stating that the gift was of the stated dollar amount rather than percentages (units) of the LLC. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm
See also Reis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm
Another was in State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
Albrecht, which raises questions about whether a state-law failure-to-warn claim is pre-empted by federal law regulating the safety and efficacy of prescription drugs, and Obduskey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
& Taylor Rest. v New York State Liq. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:29 am
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear an appeal tomorrow in a case called Lipson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
To be fair, at the cert. stage parties have only so many pages to devote to the merits, as distinguished from the cert-worthiness, of the dispute, but even by these standards the Reply brief is unimpressive.Never mind that the Reply brief never engages the historical understanding (that Akhil and I go through in detail) that state “legislatures” at the Founding were understood and defined to be entities limited by state constitutions and subject to judicial… [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:26 pm
Defences of qualified privilege and fair comment were advanced. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:38 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 281 F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir.2001)). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
Albanil v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
However, not surprisingly, few fairs and petting zoos took the recommendations to heart and the outbreaks and illnesses continued. [read post]
