Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 8661 - 8680 of 40,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Larry Hogan in response to the coronavirus.The lawsuit argues that the governor’s orders banning large gatherings and closing most businesses violate constitutional and federal laws protecting commerce, freedom of assembly, the right to protest and the right to practice their religion.The 56-page complaint (full text) in Antietam Battlefield KOA v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada reviewed this in 1989 in R. v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 12:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The First Breach came to light when a cybersecurity analysis firm identified a large number of compromised payment cards located on the “dark web” and that contained personally identifiable information (PII) and personal health information (PHI). [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
On April 24, the FTC filed a Complaint for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
 However, Hungarian engineers Gábor Domokos and Péter Várkonyi proved such assumption was wrong by creating the Gömböc: the first known 3D homogenous object with only two equilibrium points (one stable and one unstable) which always returns to its initial position on a horizontal surface. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
Given the state of the insurance industry and the large number of claims being made, it is unlikely that your insurance company will simply roll over and write a check. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
This turned out not to be true, at least for a large group of our students. [read post]