Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 40,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2020, 4:05 am
Larry Hogan in response to the coronavirus.The lawsuit argues that the governor’s orders banning large gatherings and closing most businesses violate constitutional and federal laws protecting commerce, freedom of assembly, the right to protest and the right to practice their religion.The 56-page complaint (full text) in Antietam Battlefield KOA v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada reviewed this in 1989 in R. v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 12:08 pm
The First Breach came to light when a cybersecurity analysis firm identified a large number of compromised payment cards located on the “dark web” and that contained personally identifiable information (PII) and personal health information (PHI). [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:00 am
Sela.1 The insured owned a large home with a complicated and expensive... [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm
Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" Here's the heart of the opinion in Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 6:55 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:05 am
On April 24, the FTC filed a Complaint for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:53 am
Mazars USA and Trump v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am
However, Hungarian engineers Gábor Domokos and Péter Várkonyi proved such assumption was wrong by creating the Gömböc: the first known 3D homogenous object with only two equilibrium points (one stable and one unstable) which always returns to its initial position on a horizontal surface. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 10:00 pm
The ruling in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:54 pm
Given the state of the insurance industry and the large number of claims being made, it is unlikely that your insurance company will simply roll over and write a check. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm
(Hughes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
This turned out not to be true, at least for a large group of our students. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to hear second set of arguments on reservation status of eastern Oklahoma
30 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
Enter Carpenter v. [read post]