Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 8661 - 8680 of 42,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm by Davin Rosborough
The court admitted that there was no evidence of any in-person voter impersonation fraud in Indiana, the only kind of fraud that an ID law might prevent. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jack Bogdanski
That ruling came down in January of this year. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 1:05 pm
But the group in this case was not initiated by the FDA, so it was a private partnership to which those rules did not apply. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
On a summary judgment motion, the judge has to assume the jury will believe the plaintiff's evidence and then decide if that evidence is enough to win. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:28 pm by Elliot Harmon
To make matters worse, those providers often have de facto monopolies thanks to local government policies. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:03 am by Liisa Speaker
” The Ingham County Circuit Court violated this rule by forging ahead with the adoption before the Court of Appeals judgment was final. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm by MOTP
But once a court of appeals makes an error of law, the same court can then defend and repeat the error by treating it as a prior ruling with the force of precedent.That has not happened with McElroy, but it did happen with the Dulong precedent from Dallas, which has been cited and relied upon many times by appellate courts since. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Leiza Dolghih
  While the case is ongoing, this past Friday, the Dallas Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Rathbun’s favor on the basis of the “unclean hands” defense, which is often alleged, but rarely supported, in non-competition disputes. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:41 am by Kish Law
This particular case is in federal court in Texas, but I want to provide some observations that apply no matter where the federal criminal case might be pending. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by PaulKostro
In addition, regardless of whether an objection based on Rule 403 is raised, every document’s admission is subject to a Rule 403 balancing test in order to properly assess its relative prejudice and probative value before admitting it into evidence. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:16 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  Instead, “[w]hen an issue arises before [the] PTAB, Administrative Law Judges make legal determinations as to which communications may be protected from disclosure on a case-by-case basis, based on the Federal Rules of Evidence and common law. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 1:28 am by Simon Holzer
The patent owner had not put into evidence a license agreement or other evidence that showed that the patentee would earn smaller licence fees if fewer original products were sold in Switzerland. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:18 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rather, on remand, the court will need to be presented evidence and make appropriate factual conclusions before ruling on the eligibility question. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
That’s great – everyone has had a little more time to chi–ll–ax and focus on what really matters. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:29 am by Rose Hughes
  Legal Background: RPBA 2020 and "ping-pong"The Revised Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020) were introduced in January 2020. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:11 pm
I don't currently take new criminal cases in Ellis County, and they may have changed the policy since I left, but if they haven't it doesn't matter. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:55 am
., Serial No. 87345596 (August 19, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).Functionality: Observing that the application drawing "depicts the mark to be registered," and that unclaimed matter must be shown in broken lines, Kohler, 125 USPQ2d at 1488 (quoting Heatcon, 116 USPQ2d at 1379) (citing Trademark Rule 2.52, 37 C.F.R. [read post]